In a significant development for Pakistan football, the Pakistan Football Federation (PFF) Congress has decisively rejected proposed amendments to the PFF constitution. This marks yet another chapter in the ongoing drama surrounding the administration of football in the country.
The amendments, spearheaded by the Haroon Malik-led PFF Normalization Committee (NC), aimed to introduce two key changes. The first sought to allow anyone with at least two years of experience in football, in any capacity, to contest the PFF presidential elections. The second proposed a shift from secret balloting to open voting for electing PFF office bearers.
However, the Congress dismissed both proposals with a 19-6 vote, opting instead to adhere to the rules outlined in clauses 34-38 of the 2014 PFF Constitution. This means the much-anticipated PFF elections will now proceed under the framework of the 2014 Constitution, adding further complexity to an already turbulent situation.
What’s particularly noteworthy is that these amendments were introduced under FIFA’s guidance. The global football governing body has long maintained that the PFF Constitution must align with FIFA’s requirements and statutes. By rejecting the proposed changes, the Congress has not only added to the internal tensions but also risked further scrutiny from FIFA.
The situation, already ambiguous, now appears even more uncertain. Sources have revealed that FIFA is expected to meet with members of the Normalization Committee in the coming days. This meeting could provide much-needed clarity on how Pakistan football will move forward amidst this ongoing administrative gridlock.
For Pakistan football fans and stakeholders, this latest development raises questions about the future of the sport in the country. Will FIFA intervene more assertively, or will the PFF Congress remain steadfast in its adherence to the 2014 Constitution? The coming weeks could prove pivotal in determining the direction of football governance in Pakistan.